Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lloyd v. Frontera Produce, Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv02232
Plaintiff:
Donna Kay Wells Lloyd
Defendant:
Frontera Produce, Ltd., Primus Group, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carey v. Capital Financial Associates LLC, et al
as 8:2013cv01899
Plaintiff:
Shawn Carey and Dana Carey
Defendant:
Capital Financial Associates. LLC, National Processing Group, LLC, Leon Lung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Advanced Career Technologies, Inc. v. John Does 1-10
as 1:2013cv01140
Plaintiff:
Advanced Career Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Movant:
Daniel Drasin
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
JFJ Toys, Inc. et al v. Toys "R" Us, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
JFJ Toys, Inc. and Fred Ramirez
Defendant:
Toys "R" Us, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Fiano et al v. Bayview Loan Sservicing et al
as 1:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
Gabriel S. Fiano and Mohammad Reeza Suffurally
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Sservicing, Accubane Mortgage, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
