Cases 31 - 40 of 421
Laccinole v. Nizick et al
as 4:2023cv02272
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Albert Joseph Nizick, Jr., POSC Pac doing business as Police Officers Support Committee and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Salaiz v. ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gonzalez v. KELLER POSTMAN LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Yazmin Gonzalez
Defendant:
KELLER POSTMAN LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Graham v. John Does 1-25
as 1:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daniel Graham
Defendant:
John Does #1 thru 25
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tarpley v. Cash Link USA LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Antonia Tarpley
Defendant:
Cash Link USA LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charusorn Chongchitmate and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
RD America, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
