Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WALZER et al v. SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS, USA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04174
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R WALZER, RAE B WALZER and CARRIE R WALZER
Defendant:
SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS, USA, LLC, SOLVAY SOLEXIS, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pounds v. Kenda Rubber Industrial Co., LTD. et al
as 1:2018cv05092
Defendant:
John Doe(s) #1 - #10, Kenda Rubber Industrial Co., LTD., Accell North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASTRO v. LABRIE EQUIPMENT, LTD. et al
as 2:2012cv01764
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEJIA CASTRO
Defendant:
LABRIE EQUIPMENT, LTD. , FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION , LEACH COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
FULCINELLI et al v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06329
Plaintiff:
EILEEN FULCINELLI and ANDREW FULCINELLI
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. , ZIMMER, INC. , JOHN DOE(S) (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HILL v. APPLETREE ACADEMY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
HARRY HILL
Defendant:
APPLETREE ACADEMY, INC., MASONVILLE-RANCOCAS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH , STRYKER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEIDERSPAHN et al v. WING ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02441
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WEIDERSPAHN and MARGARET WEIDERSPAHN
Defendant:
WING ENTERPRISES, INC., LITTLE GIANT LADDER CO., JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MALDONADO et al v. AMTROL, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv03029
Plaintiff:
JOSE MALDONADO and MATILDA MALDONADO
Defendant:
AMTROL, INC., AMTROL HOLDINGS, INC., JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LIAPIS et al v. MARTEST et al
as 3:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOY LIAPIS and GUS LIAPIS
Defendant:
VIRCO MARTEST, ABC MANUFACTURER, DEF MANUFACTURER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
