Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EDISON HOLDINGS NJ LLC et al v. EVERHARDT et al
as 3:2023cv23114
Plaintiff:
EDISON HOLDINGS NJ LLC and LADY BYRD INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES C. EVERHARDT, BLUE TORCH FINANCE LLC., ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
STERLING EQUIPMENT, INC. v. M/V CAPE PIONEER et al
as 2:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
STERLING EQUIPMENT, INC.
Defendant:
M/V CAPE PIONEER, GREY CEDAR SHIPPING LTD., CAPE MARITIME S.A.M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
GREEN v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv01391
Plaintiff:
ABDUL GREEN
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CONLON v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONLON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MOHLER v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
JOHN MOHLER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN and JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SMITH v. JOHN DOE(S) 1-3, ET AL
as 2:2021cv04900
Plaintiff:
ROYI SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S) 1-3, THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION and THE PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEDEE et al v. FELIPE EXPRESS et al
as 3:2015cv07075
Plaintiff:
MYRIAM LEDEE and 21ST CENTURY CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FELIPE EXPRESS, FELIPE SANCHEZ, JR., FELIPE SANCHEZ, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HYMAN v. TD BANK, NA., et al
as 1:2008cv04940
Plaintiff:
SUSAN N. HYMAN
Defendant:
TD BANK, NA.,, TD BANK, NA.,, TD BANK, NA., and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
