Cases 1 - 10 of 13
John E. Rogers v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv02760
Plaintiff:
John Edward Rogers and John E. Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Koretsky et al v. Seyfarth Shaw, LLP et al
as 1:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
Michael Koretsky, Frank Koretsky, International Video Distributors, LLC and others
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP , John E. Rogers , Jetstream Business Limited and others
Mediator:
Howard A. Tescher, David H. Lichter and Brian F. Spector
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Koretsky et al v. Seyfarth Shaw, LLP et al
as 0:2015cv61970
Plaintiff:
Michael Koretsky , Frank Koretsky , International Video Distributors, LLC and others
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP , John E. Rogers , Jetstream Business Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv04989
Plaintiff:
John E. Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
John Rogers, et al v. CIR
as 12-2686
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROGERS and FRANCES L. ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
John Rogers, et al v. CIR
as 12-2652
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROGERS and FRANCES L. ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
HAGER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00601
Plaintiff:
BRITT HAGER , BRIDGETTE HAGER , KELLY BANKSTON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Rogers et al
as 1:2010cv07068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John E Rogers, Sugarloaf Fund, LLC and Jetstream Business Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sugarloaf Fund, LLC et al v. Disantis et al
as 1:2010cv03294
Plaintiff:
Sugarloaf Fund, LLC and John E Rogers
Defendant:
Cheryl Disantis and Dennis Disantis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
