Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Goodrum v. Churchill County Detention Center et al
as 3:2020cv00540
Defendant:
John Scott, Churchill County Detention Center, Bell
and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
John Mathis, Sr. v. Laura Swanson, et al
as 18-35147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FRANCIS MATHIS, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURA L. SWANSON, JENNIFER SIMMERMEYER, LANCE GROHAL
and others
Mathis et al v. Swanson et al
as 5:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
John Francis Mathis, Sr., J.J.M
Defendant:
Laura L. Swanson, Jennifer Simmermeyer, Lance Grohal
and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Myrick v. Anglin et al
as 1:2013cv01358
Defendant:
Sarah Johnson, Dr. Caradine, John Doe
and others
Plaintiff:
Percy Myrick
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Clewis v. Hirsch et al Do Not Accept Amended Complaint or Supplement to Complaint without Court Approval per Order [6].
as 4:2013cv02308
Plaintiff:
Boris Twain Clewis
Defendant:
Billy D Hirsch, Kevin G Mayfield, Lawanda M Hightower
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03651
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ROBINSON , Jeannie Ard , Robert Higdon
and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC.
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04616
Plaintiff:
George Robinson , Jeannie Ard , Robert Higdon
and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc.
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Benard Clark v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 11-20112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENARD MARIO CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, S. BACON, PITTMAN K. BERNON
and others
Clark v. Thaler et al
as 4:2011cv00379
Defendant:
Wanza Doe, Scott Doe, John Doe
and others
Plaintiff:
Benard Mario Clark
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
