Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff: A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant: AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party: American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner: Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent: Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master: Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor: Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant: Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
Instrument Panel Clusters - Dealership Actions
as 2:2012cv00202
In Re: Instrument Panel Clusters - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc, Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. 12-11156 Doing business as Landers Toyota, Hammett Motor Company, Inc and others
Defendant: Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Incorporated, Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. and others
Interested Party: American Furukawa Inc., Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd., Katherine Clemons and others
Fuel Senders - Dealership Actions
as 2:2012cv00302
In Re: Fuel Senders - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc, Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. 12-11156 Doing business as Landers Toyota, Hammett Motor Company, Inc and others
Defendant: Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Incorporated, Denso Corporation and others
Interested Party: Katherine Clemons, Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd., American Furukawa, Inc. and others
Wire Harness - Lead Case
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff: Ifeoma Adams, Jude Anheluk, Archer-Perdue, Inc., d/b/a Archer-Perdue Suzuki and others
Defendant: American Furukawa, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
In Re: Wire Harness - Lead Case
Interested Party: Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Grupo Antolin North America, Incorporated
V.I.P. Motor Cars Ltd. et al v. ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv12002
Plaintiff: V.I.P. Motor Cars Ltd., McGrath Automotive Group, Inc., Hodges Imported Cars, Inc. d/b/a Hodges Subaru and others
Defendant: ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp., ZF Friedrichshafen AG, Lucas Automotive GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Michael Green v. Michael Burgess
as 21-2913
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL JOHN GREEN
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL BURGESS
Hydraulic Braking - Dealership Actions
as 2:2021cv04502
In Re: Hydraulic Braking - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff: V.I.P. Motor Cars Ltd., McGrath Automotive Group, Inc., Hodges Imported Cars, Inc. d/b/a Hodges Subaru and others
Defendant: ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp., ZF Friedrichshafen AG, Lucas Automotive GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hydraulic Braking Actions
as 2:2021cv04500
Plaintiff: End-Payor Plaintiffs, Halley Ascher, Gregory Asken and others
Defendant: ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp, ZF Friedrichshafen AG (the successor in interest into which TRW KFZ Ausrstung GmbH merged), Lucas Automotive GmbH (now known as ZF Active Safety GmbH) (together, TRW) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Electronic Braking - End Payors
as 2:2021cv04400
In Re: Electronic Braking - End Payors
Plaintiff: Halley Ascher, V.I.P. Motor Cars Ltd, McGrath Automotive Group, Inc. and others
Defendant: Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Electronic Braking - Dealership Actions
as 2:2021cv04402
In Re: Electronic Braking - Dealership Actions
Plaintiff: V.I.P. Motor Cars Ltd., McGrath Automotive Group, Inc., Hodges Imported Cars, Inc. d/b/a Hodges Subaru and others
Defendant: Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?