Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Southeast Stormwater Assn, Inc, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-4159
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
SOUTHEAST STORMWATER ASSOCIATION, INC., FLORIDA STORMWATER ASSOCIATION, INC., FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
In re: Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 15-3751
Petitioner:
MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Lyda Conner v. U.S. Department of the Army, et al
as 14-5355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYDA P. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army, THOMAS R. LAMONT, Assistant Secretary of the Army and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky Educa v. USA
as 12-6610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EDUCATION EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CABINET OFFICE FOR THE BLIND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through the Honorable Leon E. Panetta, Secretary of Defense, and Honorable John McHugh, Secretary of the Army
Conner v. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Lyda P. Conner
Defendant:
Department of the Army, john McHugh, Thomas R. Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Conner v. Department of the Army et al
as 5:2012cv00291
Plaintiff:
Lyda P. Conner
Defendant:
Department of the Army, John McHugh, Thomas R. Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Conley v. The United States et al
as 2:2010cv00444
Plaintiff:
Neil J Conley
Defendant:
The United States, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Army and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
