Cases 41 - 50 of 145
MICHAELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27790
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JOHN MICHAELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOREMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25125
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL FOREMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEUDO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22924
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL FEUDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOPKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16013
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haskew v. United States Marshal
as 8:2021cv00118
Petitioner:
John Michael Haskew
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOFTUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00402
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL LOFTUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haskew v. United States Marshal
as 8:2020cv02864
Petitioner:
John Michael Haskew
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06265
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL MURPHY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIBE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03145
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL KIBE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haskew v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv02539
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
John Michael Haskew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
