Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Alexander v. Shanes et al
as 1:2019cv03744
Defendant:
Daniel B. Shanes and John Murphy
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chagoya et al v. City of Chicago
as 1:2018cv06468
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sheahan, Joshua Champion, Kyle Gleeson and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Murphy et al v. Foster/Premier, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08114
Plaintiff:
John Murphy , Cecil Matthew and Nirupa Matthew
Defendant:
Foster/Premier, Inc., HomeWise Service Corp., Inc. and NextLevel Association Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacquin v. Chestine et al
as 1:2016cv05053
Plaintiff:
Eduars Alexander Jacquin
Defendant:
Chestine, Jones, Walsch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00471
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aten et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv01464
Plaintiff:
Rodney Aten , Daniel Arkels , Kevin J Bergagna and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Ag and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Unseld Banks v. Murphy et al
as 1:2015cv02328
Plaintiff:
Sondra C. Unseld Banks
Defendant:
John Murphy and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unseld Banks v. Murphy et al
as 1:2015cv02290
Plaintiff:
Sondra C Unseld Banks
Defendant:
John Murphy, Thomas J. Dart and Cook County Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berrios-Rios v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv01208
Plaintiff:
Rolando Berrios-Rios
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Connie Mennella, John Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shaw
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Murphy, Sup. Brantly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
