Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. Duffy et al
as 4:2020cv00105
Defendant:
John P Sarcone, Nan Horvat, Terry Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Iowa
as 4:2018cv00247
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Colin McCormack, Steve Foritano and others
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik and William A Hill
Plaintiff:
Andrew Russell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Horvat et al
as 4:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Nan Horvat, John P Sarcone, Terry Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Sarcone et al
as 4:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Spencer Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
John P Sarcone, Stephanie Cox, Daniel Voogt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzpatrick v. Sarcone et al
as 4:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Spencer Ray Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
John P Sarcone, Mark Taylor, Lawrence P. McLellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felipe Mendez, Jr. v. John Courter, et al
as 15-2338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felipe Mendez, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
John Courter, AUSA/S.D. Iowa, Daniel Davis, DEA agent, Mark Taylor, ADA Polk County Iowa and others
Mendez v. Courter
as 4:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
Felipe Mendez, Jr
Defendant:
John Courter, Daniel Davis, Mark Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Smith v. Nan Horvant, et al
as 13-3450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Nan Horvant, John P. Sarcone, Rizwan Shah and others
Smith v. Horvant et al
as 4:2013cv00345
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Nan Horvant, John P Sarcone, Rizwan Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Hess v. Unknown Ripperger, et al
as 11-3309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Mark Hess
Defendant - Appellee:
Unknown Ripperger, Officer Ripperger #4879, Unknown Grose, Officer Grose #4978, Dennis O'Donnel, #733 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
