Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00285
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ibanez v. Predes et al
as 3:2011cv00894
Plaintiff:
Raul Jose Ibanez
Defendant:
Nuria Predes , Clint Folson and John P Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03890
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03891
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00422
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00064
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riaz v. Mukasy et al
as 4:2008cv01192
Petitioner:
Sukhyani Riaz
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasy, Michael Chertoff, Kenneth Landgrebe and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Irvin v. Mukasy et al
as 4:2008cv01126
Petitioner:
Benjamin David Irvin
Respondent:
Michael Mukasy, Michael Chertoff, John P. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mann v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2007cv00367
Petitioner:
Apjiner Singh Mann
Respondent:
United States Of America, United States Of America, Peter D. Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
