Cases 31 - 40 of 502
Flores v. Lynch
as 1:2015cv02066
Petitioner:
Sain Alejandro Flores Elacios
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch , Jeh Johnson , John Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01477
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Jones
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Rick (I) Raemisch, Aristedes Zavaris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafoya v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01411
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tafoya
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Rick (I) Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Archuleta
as 1:2015cv01334
Petitioner:
Joseph Medina
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Suthers et al
as 1:2015cv01031
Petitioner:
Fela J. Frazier
Respondent:
John Suthers and John Chapdelain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jimenez v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lolin Jimenez
Respondent:
Colorado Department of Corrections , Rick Raemisch , Crowley County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Hager
as 1:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Thompson
Defendant:
Steve Hager, Walt Pesterfield, Brandon Schafer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosetta-Rangel et al v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
Arlene Rosetta-Rangel , Brian O'Connell and Gregory Rutschman
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Timme, et al
as 15-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE EDWARD PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAE TIMME, F.C.F. Warden, JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER CO., ET AL., and others
Nicholas v. Falk et al
as 1:2015cv00476
Petitioner:
Duane Eric Nicholas
Respondent:
James Falk and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
