Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Christopher Lee v. John Rathman, et al
as 16-13076
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER LEE
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN T. RATHMAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Cane v. Rathman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00224
Petitioner: Daryl J Cane
Respondent: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ledcke v. Rathman et al
as 1:2015cv02137
Plaintiff: Shawn Michael Ledcke
Defendant: John T Rathman, Becky Clay, Walter Vereen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Petitioner: Jeremy Pinson
Respondent: HARLEY LAPPIN, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Rathman
as 1:2014cv01693
Petitioner: Russell George
Respondent: John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Upshaw v. Rathman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01668
Petitioner: David Junior Upshaw
Respondent: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brooks v. Rathman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01478
Petitioner: Maurice Navarro Brooks
Respondent: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bruce v. Osagie et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02068
Plaintiff: Antoine Bruce
Defendant: John T. Rathman, Alejo Borrero-Hernande, Lee H. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luga-Velez v. Rathman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01250
Petitioner: Luis A Luga-Velez
Respondent: John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff: John S. Leigh
Defendant: John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?