Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22466
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17030
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ORISHABA et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05253
Plaintiff:
INNOCENT ORISHABA, SAM ORYEMA, DEO OSELE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. USA
as 5:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
Victor John Walker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Victor WalkerIn re: Victor Walker
as 23-12052
Petitioner:
In re: VICTOR JOHN WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Walker v. BurgerFi International, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv60657
Plaintiff:
John Walker
Defendant:
BurgerFi International, Inc., Julio Ramirez, Ian H Baines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23408
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWYER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11302
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALKER LAWYER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. R-Hale Trucking, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
John Walker
Defendant:
R-Hale Trucking, Inc and Ronald Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
