Cases 61 - 70 of 375
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
County of Curry v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2019op45512
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
County of Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Snohomish County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2019op45370
Defendant:
Hieu Tu Le, Purdue Frederick Company Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Snohomish County
Aguilar v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2019cv01216
Defendant:
Unit Manager Chief McDonald, Bryan Wellinghoff, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massaro v. Clipper, et al.
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
Warden Kimberly Clipper, Barbara Gainer, Tracie Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Massaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Lakewood v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2019op45221
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Lakewood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Santa Barbara et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45128
Plaintiff:
County of Santa Barbara and People of the State of California
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Missoula County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45112
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Missoula County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
