Cases 41 - 50 of 257
Haywood v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2021cv01089
Defendant:
Leonta Jackson, Mallorie Kennedy, Andrew Tilden and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruff v. Joliet Treatment Centers et al
as 1:2021cv01228
Defendant:
W Ground, Raymond Foote, Officer McGee and others
Plaintiff:
Eli Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2021cv01009
Defendant:
Kevin Keller, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mallorie Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Bednaco Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06552
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Drenstein, Dr. Ritz, Randy Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv02300
Defendant:
Jaimie Belcher, Antonio Brown, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anderson and Matthew R Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2020cv04194
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Rob Jeffreys, Robert Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2020cv04190
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, . Pumfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Couch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Kester et al
as 3:2020cv50266
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Does et al
as 1:2020cv03593
Defendant:
Cook County Public Defender, J Smith, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Ommen Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv03150
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, SIU ENT, John Does and Jane Does Medical Dental and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
