Cases 1 - 7 of 7
De Jaray et al v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A.W. DE JARAY, DARRELL R. OSWALD, PERIENNE DE JARAY and others
Defendant:
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bistrika et al v. Hunter et al
as 6:2010cv01545
Counter Claimant:
Deputy Tim Beaver, Deputy Nicholas Hunter, Deputy Cody Lane and others
503) 373-4367 (fax:
Kirstin E. Lurtz, Kirstin E. Lurtz, Kirstin E. Lurtz and others
Defendant:
Deputy Tim Beaver, City of Salem, Deputy Nicholas Hunter and others
Counter Defendant:
Alexander Bistrika, Jr., Alexander Bistrika, Sr., Lidia Bistrika and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bistrika, Jr., Alexander Bistrika, Sr., Lidia Bistrika and others
Unknown:
Sara K. Staggs, Sara K. Staggs, Sara K. Staggs and others
503)373-4367 (fax:
Gloria M. Roy, Gloria M. Roy, Gloria M. Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Crabtree Olsen et al
as 3:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barnes
Defendant:
Janaya Carter, Federal National Mortgage Association, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Inman v. Nationwide Credit, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00828
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe and Nationwide Credit, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Inman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Northwest Group, Inc. v. Doe
as 3:2012cv00662
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Northwest Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Tabb v. MYICIS et al
as 3:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
Roger L Tabb
Defendant:
MYICIS, Wayne Hicks and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
