Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Cook v. Topeka Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2018cv02216
Plaintiff:
Sara Loretta Cook
Defendant:
Topeka Correctional Facility , Kansas Department of Corrections , Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wheatland Enterprises, Inc. v. Saylor et al
as 2:2018cv02155
Plaintiff:
Wheatland Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Nikolas Shawn Saylor, John and Jane Does 1-5, ABC Corporations 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
United States of America v. New Strawn Rural Housing, A Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2017cv04112
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
New Strawn Rural Housing, A Limited Partnership, John and Jane Doe #1, John and Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Walker et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02601
Plaintiff:
Erika Flowers and Shermaine Walker
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Paul Corbier, Sohaib Mohiuddin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Auman v. State of Kansas et al
as 2:2017cv02069
Plaintiff:
Ken Auman
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Kansas Judge Franklin, Johnson County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagen v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02129
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M. Hagen
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide, Inc. , John Does/Jane Does 1-30 and Unknown Business/Corporations A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoun v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv02200
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Calhoun and Cynthia Calhoun
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation, Keith J. Bane, Robert R. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beltronics USA, Inc v. Midwest Inventory Distribution, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv02440
Plaintiff:
Beltronics USA, Inc and Beltronics USA, Inc
Defendant:
Midwest Inventory Distribution, LLC, i-Net Distributors, LLC, Audio Video Man and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
