Social Security Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Culb v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01591
Plaintiff: John Culb
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Waters v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00326
Plaintiff: John J.G. Waters
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vance v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv01674
Plaintiff: John Vance
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johns v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01136
Plaintiff: Laura A. Johns
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McKenzie v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv01026
Plaintiff: John McKenzie
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marcello v. Commissioner, Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00855
Plaintiff: John R. Marcello, Jr.
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moody v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2012cv02959
Plaintiff: Damien John Moody
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Parker v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02964
Plaintiff: John Howard Parker, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pierre v Astrue
as 1:2012cv02463
Plaintiff: John Pierre
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Collins v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02195
Plaintiff: John Wesley Collins, Jr
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?