Cases 1 - 10 of 39
DOE v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
SARA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BWC DEEP BROOK LLC et al v. FENDERSON et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
BWC DEEP BROOK LLC and BWC SWAN POND CREEK LLC
Defendant:
JOHN R FENDERSON and LINDA L FENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
SHILALIS v. MORRISON
as 2:2023cv00140
Counter Defendant:
JONATHAN SHILALIS
Counter Claimant:
JOHN H MORRISON, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC v. SECTER, PSC
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
Defendant:
JOHN SECTER, PSC doing business as SHELBY STREET VETERINARY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RITCHIE v. SYNERGETHICS INC
as 2:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
JOHN C RITCHIE
Defendant:
SYNERGETHICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STROUDWATER ASSOCIATES v. KIRSCH et al
as 2:2021cv00086
Defendant:
JOHN BEHN, DOUGLAS M JOHNSON, ROBERT W KIRSCH and others
Plaintiff:
STROUDWATER ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPERZEL v. CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS INC
as 2:2020cv00193
Plaintiff:
JOHN J SPERZEL, III
Defendant:
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WVUE 2015-1 v. DOONAN GRAVES & LONGORIA LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00364
Defendant:
JOHN A DOONAN, ESQ and DOONAN GRAVES & LONGORIA LLC
Plaintiff:
WVUE 2015-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOENDER et al v. SHIPMASTERS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
JOHN A BOENDER , SO SIMONS INC , TERENCE BURNS and others
Defendant:
SHIPMASTERS LLC, ED MCCURDY, NANCY J STEFANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOLVO FINANCIAL SERVICES v. CITYSIDE INC et al
as 2:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
VOLVO FINANCIAL SERVICES
Defendant:
CITYSIDE INC and JOHN DICKINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
