Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuffin v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Chase Brooks McGuffin
Defendant:
McIntosh County and John Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jaquez v. Cherokee County et al
as 6:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Cherokee County, John Bennett, Haley Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs v. USA
as 6:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
John Duncan Stubbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brauning v. Brooks et al
as 6:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
Michael Brooks, Jared Strand, Shannon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brauning v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
John Gilbert Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Prather v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prather
Defendant:
John Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winchester v. Christian et al
as 6:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Graham R. Winchester and Shrek
Defendant:
John Christian, Pontotoc County Health Department and Turnkey Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Christian et al
as 6:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Preston Miles Black
Defendant:
John Christian, Unknown or all other Contractors, Pontotoc County Court Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
