Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. Michaud et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oliver and Clyde Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph Leonard Michaud, Mary Susan McElroy, John James McConnell, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ocean Development Partners, LLC, et al. v. NE Edge, et al.
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ocean Development Partners, LLC, Ocean Development Partners, LLC, MA, Gotspace Data LLC and others
Defendant:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES, SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glassie v. Doucette et al
as 1:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Thomas Glassie, Paul Doucette and John Taft
Plaintiff:
Georgia Glassie
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bentele et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Aletha Bentele , James Bosner , Scott Christensen and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Laucks v. McVay et al
as 1:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Melinda Laucks
Defendant:
Mark McVay , John Deacon, Jr., W. Mark Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Laucks v. McVay et al
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Melinda Laucks
Defendant:
Mark McVay, John Deacon, Jr., W. Mark Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Schofield v. US Bank, NA et al
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Billie R Schofield
Defendant:
US Bank, NA , USAA Federal Savings Bank , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
