Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Malicki et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02457
Plaintiff: Paul Malicki and Elizabeth Malicki
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWAIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00107
Defendant: AUTOSUTURE, COVIDIEN, INC., ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DEBRA SWAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hutson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02939
Plaintiff: Cindy Hutson
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01537
Plaintiff: William West
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01523
Plaintiff: Brian S. Williams and Carol Williams
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Alza Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv05409
Plaintiff: Anna Chapman
Defendant: Alza Corporation , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DeGroot v. McNeil Consumer Healthcare et al
as 1:2010cv04253
Plaintiff: Jennifer DeGroot
Defendant: McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson, McNeil Consumer Helathcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIRSCHNER v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07002
Plaintiff: SUZANNE KIRSCHNER
Defendant: BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Curry v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00132
Plaintiff: Tiaa Curry and Tiaa Curry
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc, Johnson & Johnson Inc, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Featured Case
as 1:2007ml09831
Plaintiff: PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant: BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?