Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Booker v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv05418
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, TYCO Fire Products LP (as successor-in-interest to Ansul Company United), The Chemours Company and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hopke v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv05406
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, TYCO Fire Products LP (as successor-in-interest to Ansul Company United), The Chemours Company and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy Hopke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kinard v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv05411
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, TYCO Fire Products LP (as successor-in-interest to Ansul Company United), The Chemours Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Kinard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv05385
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, TYCO Fire Products LP (as successor-in-interest to Ansul Company United), The Chemours Company and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cali, Jr. et al v. 3M Company (f/ka/ Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2026cv13382
Defendant:
Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc. d/b/a "The Fire Store', Safety Components Fabric Technologies, Inc., Ricochet Manufacturing Co., Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cali and Joseph Cali, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Chaney et al v. Perdue Farms Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv05108
Defendant:
FPP Business Services, Inc. doing business as Perdue Farms Inc, Perdue Agribusiness Incorporated doing business as Perdue AgriBusiness LLC, Perdue Agribusiness Grain LLC doing business as Perdue AgriBusiness LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel M. Chaney, Doug C. Davis, Julie M. Davis and others
Petitioner:
The Maryland Department of Agriculture
Objector:
State of Maryland
Cross-Plaintiff:
Perdue Farms Inc, Perdue Foods Incorporated, Perdue Foods LLC and others
Cross-Defendant:
Johnson Controls International plc, Chemguard Inc, Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Muniz v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv04941
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), Du Pont De Nemours Inc. f/k/a DowDuPont Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc (f/k/a GE Interlogix, Inc.) and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Muniz
Debtor:
National Foam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv04944
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), Du Pont De Nemours Inc. f/k/a DowDuPont Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc (f/k/a GE Interlogix, Inc.) and others
Plaintiff:
Marla Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Turner v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv04945
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), Du Pont De Nemours Inc. f/k/a DowDuPont Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc (f/k/a GE Interlogix, Inc.) and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kang v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv04943
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), Du Pont De Nemours Inc. f/k/a DowDuPont Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. (f/k/a GE Interlogix, Inc.) and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Kang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
