Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JONES v. ACCURIDE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2016cv00210
Defendant:
ACCURIDE CORPORATION, ROBERT J. ADAMS, KEITH E. BUSSE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
HERFF JONES, INC. v. MCCREARY
as 1:2016mc00065
Plaintiff:
HERFF JONES, INC.
Defendant:
MORGAN D. MCCREARY
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis et al v. Alabama Limestone County et al
as 2:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
John H Davis , Shelia D Davis and Eric S Davis
Defendant:
Judge Jeanne W Anderson, Judge James W Woodroof, Jr, Athens City Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2016mc00014
Respondent:
ALSIP, CONLON, DAVIS and others
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
