Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 31 - 40 of 108
LEWIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2016cv01342
Plaintiff: LACY EDWARD LEWIS
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA, GARY JONES, STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. USA
as 1:2016cv01203
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JOSEPH JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. USA
as 1:2016cv01202
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ANTONIO LAMONT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. HOLT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01087
Petitioner: DAVID EARL JONES
Defendant: RONNIE HOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2016cv00832
Petitioner: STACEY JONES
Respondent: STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00041
Petitioner: PAUL B. JONES
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01285
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00754
Petitioner: CLEVELAND JONES
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHARLIE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROUDABUSH v. BITTINGER et al
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: BITTINGER, MARCHANELLO, T. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2014cv01296
Plaintiff: DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?