Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Santiago v. United States of America
as 22-647
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose M. Santiago
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Santiago v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv06606
Plaintiff:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santiago v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv04803
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santiago v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02667
Petitioner:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Santiago v. United States of America
as 13-902
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Santiago v. USA
as 1:2012cv04522
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santiago v. Graham
as 10-4902
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jose J. Santiago
Respondent - Appellee:
Harold D. Graham, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility
Santiago v. Graham
as 6:2008cv06465
Petitioner:
Jose J. Santiago
Respondent:
Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Santiago v. Daniel Stewart, Commissioner of Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2007cv06409
Plaintiff:
Jose J. Santiago
Defendant:
Daniel Stewart, Commissioner of Department of Corrections, New York State Attorney General of the State of New York and Richard Potter, Acting Superintendent, of Great Meadow Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2007cv06082
Petitioner:
Jose J. Santiago
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
