Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Campos-Rodriguez v. D'Agostini et al
as 2:2018cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jose Arbor Campos-Rodriguez
Defendant:
John D'Agostini, El Dorado County Sheriff's Department, Kuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campos Rodriguez v. Bainbridge Upreal LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07010
Defendant:
Bainbridge Upreal LLC, Brookland Capital LLC, Dvir Mog 18 Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosendo Campos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Campos-Rodriguez v. Dagostini et al
as 2:2017cv01448
Plaintiff:
Jose Arbor Campos-Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Dagostini, Noren, Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campos-Rodriguez v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv01269
Plaintiff:
Jose Arbor Campos-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jones, Bedford and Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Rodriguez v. Isidro Baca
as 16-73742
Petitioner:
JOSE A. CAMPOS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ISIDRO BACA
Campos Rodriguez v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00288
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Adam Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Jose Alberto Campos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campos Rodriguez v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2015cv00276
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James Cox, Dwayne Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Campos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos Rodriguez v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2015cv00212
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James Cox, Adam Paul Laxalt and others
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Campos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Campos Rodriguez v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00210
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Luis, Moonie and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Campos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos Rodriguez v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00072
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Luis, Moonie and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Campos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
