Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NAVARRO v. NECSOSA LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant:
NECSOSA LLC and DAVID DE LA CRUZ MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NAVARRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jose Navarro v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 23-55278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant / Appellee:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation and TORRANCE REFINING COMPANY LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Jose Navarro v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 22-80072
Petitioner:
JOSE NAVARRO
Respondent:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation and TORRANCE REFINING COMPANY LLC
NAVARRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34646
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAVARRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33533
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juan Navarro-Moza v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-70442
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE NAVARRO-MOZA
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
Jose Navarro v. Howmet Aerospace Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jose Navarro
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Arconic Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NAVARRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04589
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
