Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Amador et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
Regina Amador, Administratrix Regina Amador, Guadalupe Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Rodriguez v. Texas Farmers Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv03691
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Texas Farmers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Valdez v. 24 Hour Fitness et al
as 3:2018cv00981
Plaintiff:
Hector Valdez
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness, J&D Service Solutions Corp, Jose Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rodriguez v. Logik Precision Inc. & Water Jet Division
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Logik Precision Inc. & Water Jet Division
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's
as 5:2017cv01147
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarez et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd et al
as 3:2017cv02545
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alvarez , Esmeralda Hernandez , Federico Melchor and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc and M Crowd GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,as Trustee v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2017cv02483
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,as Trustee
Defendant:
Jose Rodriguez, Ameriventure, LTD., RNM Real Estate, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Ethyl Corporation
as 4:2017cv00983
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethyl Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Of America v. Rodriguez
as 7:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
