Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vazquez-Marin v. Martinez-Adorno et al
as 3:2019cv01350
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez-Marin
Defendant:
Lorraine Martinez-Adorno and Mario J. Canales-Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenspan Adjusters International Inc. v. Triple-S Propiedad, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02033
Defendant:
Joseph McCloskey, Phil Whisenhunt, Elaine Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
Greenspan Adjusters International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez-Rojas v. USA
as 3:2018cv01276
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Vazquez-Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vazquez-Marin v. Rolon et al
as 3:2018cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez-Marin
Defendant:
Erick Rolon, Wanda Montanez, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez-Marin v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2017cv01974
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez-Marin
Defendant:
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Erick Rolon, Wanda Montanez-Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. USA
as 3:2017cv01204
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Guillermo Jose Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. Forti-Ahorrio et al
as 3:2014cv01098
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. , Sanrio, Inc. , Disney Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Noel Forti-Ahorrio, Alberto Arango-Grinan , Bienvenido Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Vazquez-Rojas v. USA
as 3:2012cv02003
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Vazquez-Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vazquez-Marin v. Diaz et al
as 3:2012cv01177
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez-Marin
Defendant:
Emilio Diaz, Reynaldo Pacheco, Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
