Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hassett & George, PC v. Haymount Urgent Care, PC et al
as 3:2022mc00074
Plaintiff:
Hassett & George, PC
Defendant:
Haymount Urgent Care, PC, Robert A. Clinton, Jr., Indigo Installations, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
GoFund Advance, LLC, Funding 123, LLC, Alpha Recovery Partners, LLC and others
Haymount Urgent Care, P.C. et al v. GoFund Advance, LLC et al
as 3:2022mc00071
Plaintiff:
Haymount Urgent Care, P.C., Robert A. Clinton, Jr., Indigo Installations, Inc. and others
Defendant:
GoFund Advance, LLC, Funding 123, LLC, Merchant Capital, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Hassett & George, PC
Hassett & George, PC v. Haymount Urgent Care, PC et al
as 3:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Hassett & George, PC
Defendant:
Haymount Urgent Care, PC, Robert A. Clinton, Jr., Indigo Installations, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
GoFund Advance, LLC, Funding 123, LLC, Alpha Recovery Partners, LLC and others
Hassett & George, PC v. Haymount Urgent Care, PC et al
as 3:2022mc00073
Plaintiff:
Hassett & George, PC
Defendant:
Haymount Urgent Care, PC, Robert A. Clinton, Jr., Indigo Installations, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
GoFund Advance, LLC, Funding 123, LLC, Merchant Capital, LLC and others
Avantgarde Senior Living et al v. GoFund LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04313
Plaintiff:
Avantgarde Senior Living D/B/A Avantgarde Senior Living of Tarzana, Jason Adelman, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Avantgarde Senior Living doing business as Avantgarde Senior Living of Tarzana and others
Defendant:
GOFUND, LLC D/B/A PENN CAPITAL FUNDING, MAPCAP FUNDING, LLC, Miriam Deutsch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01245
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
