Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Antonetti v. Neven et al
as 2:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Joseph Antonetti
Respondent:
Dwight Neven and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Antonetti v. Filson, et al
as 22-15031
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Respondent / Appellee:
FILSON, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Joseph Antonetti v. E. McDaniels, et al
as 21-16687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIELS, R. BAKER, BYRNES, AKA Byrne and others
Joseph Antonetti v. Filson, et al
as 20-16795
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER, DEAL, NEVADA BOARD OF PRISON COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Antonetti v. Cox et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Defendant:
C.C. Adams, R. Aranas, Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Filson et al
as 3:2017cv00621
Petitioner:
Joseph Antonetti
Respondent:
Filson, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada Dept. of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antonetti v. Filson et al
as 3:2017cv00605
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Defendant:
Aranas, CCS Baker, Dr. Borino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Antonetti v. McDaniels et al
as 3:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Defendant:
R. Baker, Baraclough, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Antonetti v. Sgt. J #5924 T, et al
as 14-16855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
SGT. J #5924 T, Sgt. of CCDC, SGT. A. #4694, Sgt. of CCDC, SGT. JOHNSON 5025, Sgt. of CCDC and others
Antonetti v. Foster et al
as 3:2014cv00495
Defendant:
C. C. Adams, R. Aranas, Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
