Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Andrea Juncadella, et al v. Robinhood Financial LLC, et al
as 22-10669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREA JUNCADELLA, EDWARD GOODAN, WILLIAM MAKEHAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBINHOOD FINANCIAL LLC, ROBINHOOD SECURITIES, LLC, ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Daniluk v. Robinhood Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv21430
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Citadel LLC doing business as Citadel Securities, Point72 Asset Management, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniluk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wieg v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
as 1:2021cv21378
Defendant:
Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC and Robinhood Securities LCC
Plaintiff:
David Wieg and Joseph Daniluk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation
as 1:2021md02989
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ethan Arellano, Michael D Scalia, Carolyn Collier and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citadel LLC doing business as Citadel Securities, Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC and others
In Re:
January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation
Defendant:
SoFi Securities LLC, PEAK6 Investments LLC and Electronic Transaction Clearing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gil Bohrquez, Brian Harbison, Abraham Huacuja and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
Daniluk v. Robinhood Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00980
Defendant:
Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial, LLC, Point72 Asset Management, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniluk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wieg v. Robinhood Financial LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00693
Plaintiff:
David Wieg and Joseph Daniluk
Defendant:
ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC., ROBINHOOD FINANCIAL LLC, ROBINHOOD SECURITIES, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Sagi Cezana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
