Cases 1 - 10 of 11
State of Texas v. Garland
as 24-10386
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Charlotte A. Burrows, in her official capacity as Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Jocelyn Samuels, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
State of Texas v. Biden
as 23-10143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 22-30087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, by and through its Attorney General, Jeff Landry, State of Alabama, by and through its Attorney General, Steve Marchall, State of Florida, by and through its Attorney General, Ashley Moody and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden
as 22-40043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Local 918, American Federation of Government Employees, Highland Engineering, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States of America, Department of Transportation and others
Amicus Curiae:
America First Legal Foundation, 45 Members of Congress, 57 Members of Congress and others
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 22-30019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Indiana and State of Mississippi
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States of America, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
State of Texas v. Biden
as 21-10806
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Law School Clinics, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
Hollis v. Biden
as 21-60910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
T. Keith Hollis, PH.D, Dennis W. Smith, Jr., PH.D, Timothy Boden and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Board of Trustees of the State Institutions of Higher Learning, John Does 1-10 and others
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 21-30505
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Michael Nedd, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
