Cases 1 - 4 of 4
State of Nebraska, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 22-3179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Nebraska, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, Miguel Cardona, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Education and United States Department of Education
Appellant:
Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Americans for Prosperity Foundation and New Civil Liberties Alliance
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 22-1104
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Nebraska, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, United States of America, The Office of Personnel Management and others
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-3725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Nebraska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Reliant Care Management Company, L.L.C.
Appellant:
American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Chest Physicians and others
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as the Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
