Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brian Holmes, Jr. v. Hamilton County, OH Government, et al
as 24-3341
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ISIAH HOLMES, JR.
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OH GOVERNMENT, STACEY DEGRAFFENREID and JOSEPH T. DETERS
Holmes v. Hamilton County, Ohio, Government
as 2:2023cv04266
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio, Government, Stacey DeGraffenreid and Joseph T. Deters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
Lashawn Pettus-Brown v. Ethna Cooper, et al
as 15-4380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LASHAWN PETTUS-BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHNA M. COOPER, JOSEPH T. DETERS, JIM NEIL and others
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettus-Brown v. Cooper et al
as 1:2015cv00539
Plaintiff:
LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown
Defendant:
Ethna M. Cooper , Joseph T. Deters , Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penland v. Deters et al
as 1:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alex Penland
Defendant:
Joseph T. Deters, Melinda Rinehart, Simon Leis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bedford v. Kasich et al
as 2:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Bedford
Defendant:
John R Kasich , Gary Mohr , David Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tompkins v. Nadel et al
as 1:2008cv00171
Plaintiff:
Eddrick Tompkins
Defendant:
Norbert A Nadel, J. Rhett Baker, Cornelius Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vincent Guilford v. Joseph Deters
as 08-3017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT GUILFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH T. DETERS, Hamilton County Prosecutor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
