Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hood v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stillwell v. Austin Pieratt & Pieartt Law PLLC et al
as 5:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Lamario D Stillwell
Defendant:
Austin Pieratt & Pieartt Law PLLC, Josh Holloway, Geico Secure INS CO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Childers v. Valley Brook Town of et al
as 5:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Josh Childers
Defendant:
Valley Brook Town of and Jeremy Mashore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maples v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Sedona Warren, Nathan Ronan, Austin Mahsetky and others
Plaintiff:
Joanna Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Coyle Public Schools et al
as 5:2018cv00808
Defendant:
Coyle School Board of Education, Tenny Maker, Josh Sumrall and others
Plaintiff:
Mischa Smith and Patrick Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlton v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Andre M Carlton
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, Josh Gershon and Travis Teague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Lawton City of
as 5:2017cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tony L Kemp
Defendant:
Lawton City of , Trenton Ulrich, Josh Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cowboys for Life et al v. Sampson et al
as 5:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Cowboys for Life , Jennifer M Ortman and Joshua R Bowman
Defendant:
Brian K Sampson, Lee Bird, Burns Hargis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
