Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BRAVO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05478
Plaintiff:
JUAN BRAVO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Juan Bravo-Acevedo v. William Barr
as 20-72893
Petitioner:
JUAN BRAVO-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
In Re: Bravo-Fernandez, et al
as 17-1290
Petitioner:
JUAN BRAVO-FERNANDEZ and HECTOR MARTINEZ-MALDONADO
Interested Party:
SPECIAL INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR, CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO, PR DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
US v. Bravo-Fernandez
as 14-1089
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN BRAVO-FERNANDEZ
Interested Party:
SPECIAL INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF PUERTO RICO, CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PUERTO RICO and others
Bravo v. Argonaut Restaurant & Diner,Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv05163
Plaintiff:
Juan Bravo
Defendant:
Argonaut Restaurant & Diner,Inc., Sotirios Kollias and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company v. Friedman, Cohen, Taubman & Company, CPAs, LLC et al
as 0:2013cv60836
Plaintiff:
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Friedman, Cohen, Taubman & Company, CPAs, LLC, Ronald S. Friedman, Andrew S. Taubman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
US v. Bravo-Fernandez
as 12-1289
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN BRAVO-FERNANDEZ
Interested Party:
SPECIAL INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF PUERTO RICO and THOMAS RIVERA-SCHATZ
In Re: Bravo-Fernandez, et al
as 52-1049
Petitioner:
HECTOR MARTINEZ-MALDONADO and JUAN BRAVO-FERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
In Re: Bravo-Fernandez, et al
as 11-1049
Petitioner:
HECTOR MARTINEZ-MALDONADO and JUAN BRAVO-FERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
US v. Bravo-Fernandez
as 11-1044
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN BRAVO-FERNANDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
