Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Pirtle v. Castillo
as 1:2010cv01076
Petitioner:
Vystoskia Tonve Pirtle
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Mar v. Castillo et al
as 2:2010cv02067
Petitioner:
Paul M. O'Mar
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo, Johnny Williams, Olori O. Ajamu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burns v. Castillo
as 2:2010cv02041
Petitioner:
Michael R. Burns
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Porter v. Castillo
as 2:2009cv02807
Petitioner:
Saleem Porter
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rufus v. Castillo
as 2:2009cv02774
Petitioner:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Koon v. Castillo et al
as 2:2009cv02684
Petitioner:
Jeremy Koon
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo, Harley Lappin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Koon v. Castillo
as 2:2009cv02637
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Koon
Defendant:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv02363
Petitioner:
Carl Brown
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo and Nahem Naimey
Defendant:
Sterling Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dixon v. Castillo
as 2:2009cv02341
Petitioner:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Butler v. Castillo
as 2:2009cv02333
Plaintiff:
Philander Butler
Defendant:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
