Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Morales et al v. Rise Development Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jose Elias Ramirez Melgar, Jose R. Avila, Silviano Espiritu and others
Defendant:
Rise Concrete LLC, Jose Alvarez, Rise Development Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morales et al v. Rise Development Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03517
Defendant:
Rise Concrete LLC, Jose Alvarez, Rise Development Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Maldonado and Israel Morales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Maldonado Eslava et al v. Green Summit Group LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03263
Plaintiff:
Juan Maldonado Eslava
Defendant:
Green Summit Group LLC, Peter Schatzberg and Todd Millman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Maldonado Eslava et al v. 56 Third Food Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv02879
Plaintiff:
Juan Maldonado Eslava and Felipe Meza
Defendant:
56 Third Food Corp., Sher Third Food Corp., Basilex Food Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Maldonado v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02861
Plaintiff:
Juan Maldonado
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Jeffrey Sisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eslava v. Safi-G Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04175
Plaintiff:
Juan Maldonado Eslava
Defendant:
Safi-G Inc. , John Doe Inc. and Nasser Ghorchian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Maldonado v. Morris Lobel & Sons Inc et al
as 1:2013cv05470
Plaintiff:
Juan Maldonado
Defendant:
Morris Lobel & Sons Inc and Stanley Lobel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
