Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Jeannite v. Shetrawski et al
as 1:2024cv10363
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Shetrawski, Captain Flynn, Brook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeannite v. Sorokin et al
as 1:2023cv12854
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
J. Sorokin doing business as judge at supreme court and Young doing business as judge at supreme court
Jeannite v. Saris
as 1:2023cv11885
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Judge Patti Saris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Judge Denise Casper et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Judge Denise Casper and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson et al v. Todisco Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11567
Plaintiff:
Natalie Anderson and Andre Bisasor
Defendant:
Todisco Services Inc., Pasquale III Todisco, Matthew Mazzarella and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Kenneth P. Neiman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cantave v. Gomes et al
as 1:2023cv10883
Plaintiff:
Nakia Cantave
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Sylvia Gomes, Jessire Pena, Patrisha Toxey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Voltus, Inc. v. Harold
as 1:2023cv10662
Plaintiff:
Voltus, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory Harold
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Jennifer C. Boal
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2022cv11746
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Victor v. Orozco et al
as 1:2022cv11348
Plaintiff:
Danielle Victor
Defendant:
Judge Yolanda Orozco, Paul Marciano, Judge Linda Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
