Cases 41 - 50 of 76
McKnight v. Kolberg et al
as 2:2017cv01344
Defendant:
ADA Adam Gibb, Judge Michael Greenlick, ADA Dave Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Tim McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv00935
Defendant:
Stacey Borgman, Judge Douglas Van Dyke, Michael Haines and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Joshua Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Judge James R. Ellis and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Beatty et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Defendant:
Judge C. Beatty and Judge Mercedes F. Diez
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Bearden et al
as 3:2016cv02033
Respondent:
Judge Bearden, Board of Parole, Jamiel Brown and others
Petitioner:
James Ramon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Vogt
as 6:2016cv01978
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dale Pearson
Respondent:
Judge Debra Vogt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Frantz et al
as 3:2016cv01917
Petitioner:
Edward Earl Bailey
Respondent:
Board of Parole, Judge Frantz, Sandra Rorick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelby v. Bunch et al
as 1:2016cv01426
Defendant:
Terry Amous, Honorable Judge D. Bunch, D.A. of Klamath CO. and others
Plaintiff:
Elric V. Shelby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv00668
Defendant:
Judge Anne Brown, Judge Mark D. Clarke, Judge Michael H. Simon and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Wardlaw et al
as 2:2016cv00671
Defendant:
Judge Callahans, Judge Hawkins, Judge Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
