Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03791
Not Yet Classified:
Ms. Judith Teffera
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03794
Plaintiff:
Ms. Judith Teffera and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03797
Plaintiff:
Judith Teffera and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BREEZEE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
JASON M BREEZEE, KYLE M. BUMP, CHRISTOPHER L. BURNHAM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
BRAXTON v. PIPE
as 1:2023cv03023
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
JUDITH PIPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AINSWORTH et al v. ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02424
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY A AINSWORTH, JODI CATHLEEN NAKATA, JILL MARIE HIGGINS and others
Not Classified By Court:
CLYDE WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN, THE IRANIAN MINISTRY, ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MODUGU v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
SAI PRANEETH REDDY MODUGU
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JUDITH RAVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
