Cases 1 - 10 of 267
INGRAM v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv05993
Petitioner:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. ACCHIONE et al
as 2:2024cv04347
Plaintiff:
LEVAUNT PETERSON
Defendant:
K. ACCHIONE and S.C.O. M. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AYHLLON v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
JOEL CARLO AYHLLON
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIMMELREICH v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Petitioner:
WALTER HIMMELREICH
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON and K. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GREGORIO v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
ROMULO GREGORIO
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS, M. EBO, RN., DR. HAGGAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGGS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv23402
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., M. CHERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLEBROOKS v. SALCEDO et al
as 2:2023cv21601
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
K. SALCEDO, J WATKINS, RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAINEY v. MCKITTRICK
as 3:2023cv21170
Plaintiff:
COWAN RAINEY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. MCKITTRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
