Cases 31 - 40 of 44
K W et al v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
K W , C M , C L and others
Defendant:
Richard Armstrong , Paul Leary and Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
Amicu:
Idaho Care Providers Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lopez v. K-Mart
as 1:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christian Lopez
Defendant:
K-Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dettrick v. United States Department Veterans Affairs
as 1:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Laurie Dettrick
Defendant:
Eric K Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seals v. mitchell et al
as 1:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Michael Izell Seals
Defendant:
rodney k mitchell and John Rynhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naum v. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare et al
as 1:2009cv00633
Plaintiff:
James Naum
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Barbara K. Richards, Janice Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nampa Classical Academy et al v. Goesling et al
as 1:2009cv00427
Plaintiff:
Nampa Classical Academy, Nampa Classical Academy, Nampa Classical Academy and others
Defendant:
William Goesling, Brad Corkill, Gayann DeMordaunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bedke et al v. Salazar et al
as 4:2009cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jared K. Bedke, Bruce Byron Bedke and Martha Jean Bedke
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, US Department of Interior, US Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
