Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Mehner et al v. Hassell et al
as 1:2013cv01174
Plaintiff:
Karl Erich Mehner and Frances Jo Mehner
Defendant:
Gerald Hassell , Bank of New York , 7 Cedar Lane, Sandia Park and others
Counter_claimant:
Robert K Goulding and Barbara M Goulding
Counter_defendant:
Karl Erich Mehner and Frances Jo Mehner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
Marcelina Martinez and Gilbert Romero
Defendant:
Julian Gonzales, Eloy Griego, Penny Ellis-Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
O'Rourke v. Northern New Mexico College et al
as 1:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Nancy K O'Rourke
Defendant:
Northern New Mexico College, Susan Pacheco and Nancy Barcelo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Owens v. Stoll
as 1:2012cv01302
Plaintiff:
Lee K Owens
Defendant:
Charles Stoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
