Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sloan (PS) v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
John H. Sloan
Defendant:
Samuel P. Ambrose, Kiarra C. Jenkins, Alfonso K. Carrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swain et al v. Routt County Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Martha Swain, Sue Swain, O. A. and others
Defendant:
Routt County Department of Human Services, Kristin Hintz, Camilla Haight and others
Davis v. Paisley et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joshua E. Davis
Defendant:
Brian Paisley, Brian (I) Paisley, Brian Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Viegas et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2023cv03291
Plaintiff:
Keri Lynn Viegas and James Viegas
Defendant:
Thomas K. Kane, Chuck Broerman, Scott D. Toebben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Smith (PS) et al v. WCDTF et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Nathan J Smith and Holly M Smith
Defendant:
WCDTF, GJPD, Sherrifs Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rhame v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Liza Rhame
Defendant:
State of Colorado, SE CDOC Parole-Op, El Paso County, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
