Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Perkins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00162
Petitioner:
Leon K. Perkins
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibbs v. Robinson et al
as 1:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Arson I. Gibbs, Sr.
Defendant:
Sue L. Robinson, Anthony J. Scirica, Dolores K. Sloviter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pair v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
Caleb Pair
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David K. Holman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Morgan et al
as 1:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
Albert James Brown
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mark Emig, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaton v. Danberg et al
as 1:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Eaton
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv00768
Plaintiff:
Derrick K. Coley
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Rafael and Burger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Awala v. Roberts et al
as 1:2007cv00531
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Anthony J. Scirica, Samuel Alito, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Carrol et al
as 1:2007cv00430
Petitioner:
Bradford K. Jones
Respondent:
Thomas Carrol and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00386
Petitioner:
Aaron K. Carter
Respondent:
Thomas Carroll and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Lou Garden Price, Sr.
Defendant:
Tom Carroll, Elizabeth Burris, D. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
